About Me

Anti-Leadership

windowslivewriterleadershipvsmanagement-13209image-thumbIn his book, Tribes, Seth Godin makes these two statements: (1) “Management is about manipulating resources to get a known job done” and (2) “Leadership, on the other hand, is about creating change that you believe in.”

As I examined these statements from the early pages of Tribes, I realized that throughout my ministry training – both formal and informal – I was taught to manage, not lead. Not only that, but I was instructed in anti-leadership. I was shaped to be adept at strategies of how NOT to change anything, how NOT to innovate, in essence, how NOT to lead.

An oft-quoted piece of advice in this anti-leadership world is that when you are entering a new ministry context, you should spend at least a year massaging the status quo, never changing anything, and challenging as few practices as possible. I understand the root and genesis of this kind of thinking, and there is some wisdom there, but as I have lived it in three different ministry contexts and as I’ve seen other ministers enter into new contexts, I have seen how this thinking has and is leading to the stagnation and decline in my denominational tribe.

What’s more, throughout my ministry training I was taught incredible and deeply troubling truths about God, scripture and the purpose of the church. Invariably, a student would passionately question why our churches weren’t talking about these things. In response, someone would tell us how we had to be patient and take it slow. It is no wonder then that so many churches never mature, develop or grow.

If management is manipulating resources to get known outcomes then the very best a management-trained minister can do is keep a 200-member church a 200-member church! None of the very best and most healthy churches in my non-denominational tribe have grown significantly in the last 10 years.

None.

Zero. 

Nada.

One reason is obvious; our systems are set against innovation, change and growth. For some reason, we have come to believe that our churches should operate as they did 10, 20 and even 50 years ago. This is partly because our very identity is rooted in restoring something that was (1st century church), rather than becoming something that is not yet (the coming kingdom of God).  Clearly then, if your fundamental orientation is backward looking you never need leaders, only managers.  You don’t need men and woman with vision, only exegetes. You wouldn’t want to consider new approaches for new generations; you simply need to force younger people to appreciate what older people appreciate and when they don’t call them faithless. Regardless of how much time we spend talking and praying about evangelism, mission, missional ecclesiology, growth, formation or discipleship, our systems are stacked against ever doing any of them at best and diametrically opposed at worst. I know. I have seen this dynamic up close and personal.

So this is a call to leadership, for myself and for the good men and woman in ministry I have known over the years who still remain within our churches. It is time for us to lead! To look forward and create new pathways and initiate change people can believe in. If we do not, then our brand of churches may be looking at dark days ahead.

——————————————-

POST-SCRIPT: (It’s important for me to say that I was taught scripture and ministry by extraordinarily faithful men and women, most of whom were taught – or trapped in – the same anti-leadership environs I was. I am eternally indebted to them for their teaching, ministries and gracious “A’s”.)

  • Rhesa

    Well, and passionately, stated!

    Lead on, Sean, the kingdom is near!

  • I like this – and I can relate from the outside how difficult true “leadership” can be.

    In my business, “That’s the way we’ve always done it” is the standard answer. Nobody wants to change because nobody wants to rock the boat. No matter how carefully presented, it’s still change.

    I’ve had to adapt some of what I learned as a sales consultant to my current position of software administrator. I support a system that nobody likes – until they learn how powerful it is. And I have to grab people by the ear and drag them through training a couple of times until the light bulb comes on.

    Perhaps it’s the same way in the church. I’ve heard it said that ministry is not a sales position. We’re not selling salvation. But we need to get peoples’ attention to divert them from condemnation to salvation. And when, to a sinner like me, the life of salvation appears to be all negatives, sales tactics are needed.

    That means change.

    That means leading them to the water.

    That means showing – demonstrating – the truth in our own lives and how glorious it can be. ‘Specially when we don’t feel like it.

    OK – I’m babbling now. But I really like the post. Thanks!

  • Pingback: Being Conventional (or why I can’t take Boise St football seriously) | The Palmer Perspective()

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes