About Me

Breakdown, The First Steps of Deconstructing Your Paradigm

Reading the Bible isn’t as easy as I was taught as a child.

For instance, a few months ago I walked a group of people through a class entitled, A Dangerous Word. Essentially we examined how we read scripture. It’s obvious – given the 1,000’s of Christian denominations – that people and ecclesiological traditions read the Bible differently. What’s less obvious – and this applies to all groups – is that “we” have a particular way of reading scripture. What’s more, “our” way of reading is largely culturally-conditioned and has it’s own beauty and it’s own blind spots. Texts that are crucial to one person or group are oftentimes marginalized or flat-out ignored by others – it’s called “privileging a text.”

This privileging of texts gets pretty astonishing at times. some traditions find themselves honoring and privileging one half of a sentence and ignoring the second part of the same sentence. For instance, the church of my childhood demanded that “Church of Christ” was the only proper name for a church because it was the only one mentioned in the New Testament (Romans 16.16). Yet, in those same churches, no one – and I mean NO ONE – ever exchanged a “Holy kiss” though that is also in Romans 16.16. As Scot McKnight has pointed out in his great book, The Blue Parakeet“every one of us adopts and (at the same time) adapts the Bible to our culture.”

In preparing the class I was once again reminded how difficult it is to peel back our constructs in order to build a better and more constructive one. Like many theology students, the death of our “first naivete” and the introduction of  the “hermeneutics of suspicion,” can be oft-putting. People, including myself, are resistant to the process of deconstruction.

For one, deconstruction is hard. In the process we have to examine our preconceptions and offer the lamb of our philosophical and theological constructs up for sacrifice. Only truth-seekers can truly do this. Those who desire to use their version of truth or partial truth reject the process out-right. There’s simply too much at stake – namely power. In order to get to the heart of truth one must be willing to clear the debris of partial truth, idols and comforting platitudes.

Second, the deconstructive process puts our past on the line. We are who we are because of our history. Even our painful experiences shape us. Since most of us like ourselves we protect our history. How disorienting it is to willingly engage a process that critiques both our current belief system and past beliefs…especially for leaders. We’ve given advice and walked through life with other people, offering the seeds of a belief system throughout the process. We bring into question the good we have done if we allow ourselves to questions the beliefs that gave rise to those good works. For Christians, this should be mitigated by belief that God is working through us and it was never about us in the first place.

Third, it’s easy to believe that if we don’t recognize or acknowledge something, it’s not really there. For instance, if we never talk about translation issues, hermeneutics, the role of genres, etc…then they don’t exist. Questions regarding the function of Genesis 1-12, Job, Daniel or Revelation aren’t easy to wade through, yet we need to nevertheless.

We need the deconstructive process for one simple reason: Truth! Many Christians live with false, ultimately indefensible, and theologically poor paradigms because we have simply swallowed  what was spoon fed us as children, teens, or when we first came to have a life-changing, though rudimentary relationship with Jesus. Yet, for many, the process is simply too painful to embrace.

But I don’t know anyone who deeply wants to live with an ill-concieved or false worldview. We don’t reject deconstruction because we desire falsehood, we reject it because it’s painful. Yet, it is Jesus who assures us that the truth will set us free. Therefore, when we examine the scriptures, we are seek nothing less than truth. The best Bible readers – both laity and clergy – seek truth with the fundamental belief that whatever else we sacrifice on our journey to truth is worth sacrificing.

  • Wayne Knox

    Yes, “truth” is much easier when it is spoon fed as no thought has to go into it. When we seek the Truth, then sometimes there is a cost for you to share your thoughts or act on your belief in that TRUTH. Reputation sometimes is put at stake because of it. Is one willing to lay everything on the line for it? There is depth in the saying ingnorance is bliss. My prayer is that we all struggle because of knowledge of Truth and our actions because of it. May we be blessed because of our struggles.

  • Excellent thoughts.

    Saw a good example of this during a mission trip to Mexico. Some men from the States were presenting a lesson on elders. One of the Mexican brethren asked if there were any way a military man could be an elder, given that military service is so incompatible with the gospel (the questioners words). The translator, a Mexican national who lives in the States, immediately saw the conflict and didn’t even want to translate the question! He toned it down, and the men from the States raved enthusiastically about how military men are among the best suited to be elders.

    Obviously the two cultures read Scripture in a very different way.

    • Wow, Tim. When I daw this I had to immediately respond.

      Interestingly, while I was teaching the class, Glenn Beck’s comments about socialism and the gospel were heavily at play in the news. Friends of our, who have served as missionaries abroad and who still travel the world, told us that in the places they visit, many Christians wonder how American Christians can have such strong responses to ‘socialism.’ Their read of the scriptures told them that the early churches compiled their resources for the good of the group, especially the underprivileged. For them, socialism, not independence was more compatible with the gospel.

      I’m not attempting to make a statement about government, but that one incident alone if enough evidence to reinforce what we already know about reading the Bible: What you already believe matters and it’s extraordinarily difficult to get past it – for EVERYONE.

  • Pingback: Going Naive: The Next Step In Re-Reading The Bible | The Palmer Perspective()

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes